With the increased global demand in oil and gas, undiscovered areas of the world should be opened up to access more resources.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that in order to meet rising universal demand of fossil fuels, many unexplored regions of our planet should be searched for it. This essay completely disagrees with the statement above. The essay will first discuss the detrimental effects of fossil fuels on environment, and secondly, conventional sources of energy as better alternative.
Since the invention of oil and gas, it became extremely popular and widely used as dependant sources of energy. However, these fossil fuels have shown detrimental effects on our planet. Therefore, the untouched areas of the earth should not be explored in search of additional oil and gas. Global warming is well known issue and majority will agree that extensive use of fossil fuels is a prime reason for this climate change. For example, extreme rains in driest part of the world, Saudi Arabia, left everyone surprised and caused significant damage. It resulted in enormous damage to roads and infrastructure which were not built to sustain these abnormalities.
In order to meet rising demand of energy, it is recommended that global initiatives should be taken to utilize a conventional source of energy. If many developed nations work together, it highly possible that we will have a reliable and eco-friendly source of energy in coming future. The innovation of electric cars can be considered as a good illustration as this technology is developed by collaboration of several countries. The cost associated with this technology was the biggest challenge, but doing extensive research globally, now it is possible to affordably mass manufacture and use these cars. Similar approach is needed to make solar energy and wind mills practical as well as affordable.
In conclusion, to meet never ending demand of fossil fuels it is advised that natural unexplored territories should be left alone and more research should be done to make solar energy and wind mills as a practical source of energy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the driest'.
Suggestion: in the driest
...mate change. For example, extreme rains in driest part of the world, Saudi Arabia, left e...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23492063492 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86221771524 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549206349206 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5380479714 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.933333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172216471855 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549990793076 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551843091177 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105789172809 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020421518305 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.