With an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will become a thing of the past. To what extent do you agree?
The way of communication has been changed in this contemporary world owing to the modern technologies and availability of the internet. Electronic mails and text messages have substituted postal services and phone calls have taken place of the video calling over internet. More and more people are turning to these methodologies making face to face communication outdated. However, I believe that direct communication among masses cannot be replaced.
There are many benefits of the modern modes of the correspondence. Firstly, internet has made the world closer and contributed to the globalization. Through the blogs and social networks, people can contact others of the same interest around the world. Secondly, this channel of communication is quick and time saving in terms of seconds. For example, postal services take minimum one day to send a postcard overseas, but the email services can do that work in few seconds. Finally, it is available all over the world making it easy for anyone to contact a friend or a relative anywhere on this planet.
Despite these benefits, it is not possible to replace the face to face communication. There are several grounds for this argument. Firstly, gestures and body language are very crucial to convey the message which is not possible with the modern way of communication. For instance, it is very easy to guess the feelings of the person through direct confront. Secondly, of course the emoticons are there to represent the emotions, but they cannot take place of human emotions and facial expressions. For example, it is quite hard to understand the feeling of happiness of a wife whose husband came from the long duty of six months. Lastly, human interactions are the basic interpersonal skills for the mankind and civilizations.
To conclude, although having many merits for the present days’ technologies, face to face communication cannot become obsolete or extinct.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25161290323 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97884319221 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558064516129 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9460972017 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.4444444444 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05555555556 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176473824286 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505295548933 0.084324248473 60% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641689894529 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123270205363 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724302341924 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.