International sporting events are costly and bring problems to the hosting country. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give specific reasons and examples to support your position.
International sporting events such as the Olympics and Commonwealth games have a large audience these days. Some people believe that the nation hosting these events also invites many issues and a financial burden. I completely disagree with this argument and will discuss why I believe so in this essay.
To begin with, critics of hosting world level events argue that the country must spend a lot of money. They have to build world-class facilities, arrange for transportation, accommodations, and make other arrangements for the players, officials, and their families. Additionally, sometimes they need to relocate some of its citizens to occupy the required area for the events. Going through this process can be quite stressful and may indeed bring some trouble.
However, in my opinion, the difficulties of hosting such grand events are insignificant compared to the benefits they bring. Firstly, building world-class facilities and other arrangements generate a lot of employment for the host country. Job creation is not just limited to one particular field but is achieved in many sectors including hospitality, restaurants, local shops, and more. Moreover, organizing large-scale events puts the country in the world’s spotlight. The country can use all the goodwill to attract more tourists. Research suggests that after any major international sporting event, a country quadruples the number of visitors in the following five years of the time period. Therefore, the amount of wealth generation during and after the event eclipses the cost and difficulties incurred for a brief period of time.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that a country should always welcome the opportunity to host international sporting events. Despite some initial difficulties, this will only bring more prosperity to the nation organizing these events.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 821, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...t and difficulties incurred for a brief period of time. In conclusion, I strongly believe tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5371024735 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02096789956 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611307420495 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.264617639 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.9375 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6875 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177083613513 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590969745688 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444024176155 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107928173937 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335393024674 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.