Films and computer games which contain violence are very popular. Some people believe they have a negative effect on society and so should be banned. Other people, however, say they are just harmless and help people to relax. Discuss both these points of view and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, movies and video games containing inhuman activities attract a lot of youngsters. Many argues that this impacts social setting negatively and should be forbidden, whereas others believe they are neutral and in fact help people to refresh their mind. This essay discusses both sides of this argument and then I will give my perspective.
In the first place, movies and computer games leave great impression on human's mind. There is a large section of people who are not matured enough and take inspiration from such violent virtual environment. These people often try to follow same activities and stunts in the real life. For example, after one of the famous movies names "Dhoom" was released, we saw exponential increase in crime involving sports bikes. Therefore, if such movies or games are banned, they will be beneficial to the community.
On the other hand, violent films and games depict what happens in today's world. It is up to the individual on how he or she thinks about such programs. Moreover, such virtual world is just another creative product from developers and writers and many people take is only as a fun, time pass activity and enjoy it. There are several positives out of these creations as they offer ideas on how to overcome difficult situations and catch the sinners. There are many real life police cases that have taken inspiration from intelligent movies and have solved mysteries.
In conclusion, I believe both sides of the argument have their merits. On balance, however, I believe that banning any objectionable content won't stop person's behavior and he will find a different way to continue doing such activities. Although, there should be warnings or positive message provided with such content.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, whereas, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15734265734 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67835134823 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632867132867 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0261273693 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1875 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240597737923 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694606968867 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523422800474 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134915246866 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395044729226 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.