Global tourism has become popular in the last few decades and it has various beneficial aspects for both travellers and the place they visited. This essay will discuss why the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
To begin with, it is obvious that the cost of international travelling is expensive for most travellers, especially during holiday seasons. The extra cost can be a heavy burden for a middle-class family and it causes the lack of opportunity to leisure in abroad. In addition, once a country becomes famous for its tourism, there is a risk of increasing crimes due to people from around the world.
Whereas, travelling has a lot of positive impacts on visitors and a country's economy. A greater amount of money that is used by travellers is one of the main resources for the country if it puts efforts on the industry to encourage people to visit their country. Based on the income, a government promotes its touring industry and plan events. Moreover, the money gathered from travellers supports the country in a range of ways such as developing the quality of a nation's lifestyle further and providing better services for visitors. For example, in Japan, public transportation has installed English and other several languages for an announcement for people from different countries so that they are able to understand all instructions on the transport. In addition, international travelling is always a stimulating activity to experience something new and unique from a different culture. Travellers gain a lot of experiences that would never happen in their homeland. This makes people more diversity.
In conclusion, global travelling enhances a country's development not only people's values even though travelling has negative sides.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 466, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ays such as developing the quality of a nations lifestyle further and providing better ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, whereas, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29642857143 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01721041253 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2725137602 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.928571429 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274828737816 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088882723667 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627339007965 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173282075752 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067318163988 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.