With internet improvements, people can share views or opinions on certain goods or services that they have purchased. Is this a good or a bad thing? Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Essay topics:

With internet improvements, people can share views or opinions on certain goods or services that they have purchased.

Is this a good or a bad thing?

Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Owing to the advancements in the internet, most of the e-commerce sites these days provide a facility for the users to share the feedback about the purchased products. Although this can sometimes misguide the consumers, in my perspective, it is beneficial as it helps the buyers to check the credibility of the product.

Admittedly, the facility of online reviewing system is misused by many producers. The reason for this is, in order to increase the sales of the items they make use of fake positive reviews and opinions which many a time misguide the consumers. As most of the end-users prefer to buy the product with more rating and positive feedback. To exemplify, a start-up mobile company 'Juno' fooled thousands of people throughout India with the help of misleading and false reviews of their non-smart and low-quality mobile phones.

Nevertheless, despite the aforementioned drawback, online sharing of opinions on purchased goods is advantageous as it can provide a better insight into the product quality. With this platform people who have already purchased the item can openly share their good or bad experience of using the product. Consequently, this will not only help the other buyers to analyse the effectiveness of the item but also make the selection of product easy. For instance, in the global marketing ranking of the end-user facilities provided by the e-commercial sites, Amazon's rating facility on each good and service is ranked first, as it facilitates the users to buy the best item.

In conclusion, while there are some instances where an unauthorized feedback system can be misleading, in my opinion, the overall review system is a benefit for the end-users as it allows them to analyse the quality of goods.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, nevertheless, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17543859649 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88956262712 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557894736842 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.3002527836 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.090909091 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9090909091 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19083730291 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720318352526 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671242633694 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104694266787 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616664063938 0.056905535591 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.