‘The Internet will never replace traditional course books in schools.’ How far do you agree with this prediction?
Internet has emerged as an important tool, supplementing modern education and has become a necessary component of today's teaching - learning process. Although, it is undeniably useful for the learners, but, in my opinion, its merits cannot outweigh the role played by traditional text books.
Firstly, course books are a result of extensive research by competent and highly qualified educationists, and are developed in accordance to the objectives set as per curriculum. Their contents are sequenced to ensure step by step and logical introduction of the concepts keeping in mind the concerned age group and corresponding learning capabilities. Secondly, the content in course books is precisely what a pupil needs to study for their respective class. This helps students to stay focused on what is relevant to their course. Finally, text books are convenient to use and follow, without causing unnecessary strain on eyes.
The Internet, on the other hand, provides access to the vast sea of information and, enables one to expand the horizons of curiosity. It has proven to be beneficial to clarify and understand difficult topics. It can be used to gain access to in depth knowledge, along with providing help in visualizing objects and phenomenon which are otherwise hard to comprehend. For instance, using online videos, three dimensional view of things can be better comprehended by looking at objects from different angles. Similarly, further explanations on any topic can be found just at one click. Furthermore, the greatest advantage is witnessed while conducting research. It makes information from all around the world available almost instantaneously. For example, doing literature surveys becomes way easier with its help. However, in spite of its many applications in higher levels of education, skimming large amounts of data can be distracting and overwhelming for school going children.
In conclusion, the Internet can be an important addition to educational resources available to the education faculty, but it cannot take the place of conventional text books.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...component of todays teaching - learning process. Although, it is undeniably useful for ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...enced to ensure step by step and logical introduction of the concepts keeping in ...
^^
Line 2, column 533, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Finally
...sed on what is relevant to their course.Finally, text books are convenient to use and f...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...e, doing literature surveys becomes way more easier with its help. However, in spite of its...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...content of the conventional text books.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 243.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50617283951 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14681514855 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.658436213992 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.571955069 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.636363636 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0909090909 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.7272727273 7.06120827912 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0926303990566 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0330117278313 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0246866479286 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.047153536621 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192567845511 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.