It is better for children to read by using online materials or by using printed material? Discuss and give your own opinion
This society has been changed by the advent of the Internet in twenties centuries. The methods of education have been vastly changed which brought about different attitudes towards this. Many believe that the benefits of online materials outweigh the printed books due to the vast and synthetic sources. I do appreciate this notion; however, frequent drawbacks of the online materials have proved the crucial role of the printed books for pupils.
First and foremost, there are ample of unreliable sources on the cyberspaces which offer inaccurate data. Thus, pupils are inevitably exposed to Wrong documents which would have dire consequences such as misleading. In addition, there are many sites and weblogs which present pornography or other detrimental photos. Thus, although online materials are beneficial in wholesomeness, it should be utilized under the supervision of parents or teachers in order to address these problems.
Secondly, reliable materials are essential to guide students. Printed materials have been thought for several years and they are accepted by pedagogic experts, which means that the printed books have proved to exist in the school curriculum and they will certainly develop students education. This can be more important in primary school's students who are more vulnerable. As a result, they would be affected adversely, if they do not have an accurate material in their schools.
In conclusion, it seems that the advantages of the printed books clearly outweigh the benefits of online materials since the pupils are not capable to sift the correct materials by their owns.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... accurate material in their schools. In conclusion, it seems that the advanta...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44621513944 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71320883796 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585657370518 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2310892092 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.153846154 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188526313525 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677583427991 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694233664327 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124817269611 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486647447222 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.