It has been said that reading for pleasure is better in developing imagination and language skills than watching TV. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Leisure time are usually spend on entertainment and personal development. In this internet era, it is being noticed that the people tend to spend on watching video content than reading. It is often said that reading helps for nurturing the imagination development and improving linguistic skills, consequently, I totally agree with the views. Reading makes our brain think deeper and learn new words and phrases written by the writer.
Reading books, articles or newspaper, develops imagination skills and makes the reader a creative thinker. While reading the book, "Rich Dad, Poor Dad", by Robert Kiyosaki, the readers are destined to think about the hard-working character to become independent from the monotonous job. Moreover, the reader begins to create images the writer wants to portray, which broadens the perspective and thinking limitations. Thus it is justifiable that reading has positive development towards thought processing.
Subsequently, the learning of new vocabularies is easily achievable by reading. It is said that to improve language skills reading will not help to increase the word dictionary in the brain but also the way those can be used in different situations. To illustrate, pre-schooling begins with reading so that pupils understand and remember the ways sentences are made. Moreover, the books are defined as per the level of reader, so that one can select the book as per their level of language skills.
Watching video contents only leads to absorbing the story without imagining things, because it is already shown by the director. Furthermore, linguistic development depends upon listening abilities, and it is difficult to make a note of vocabularies used on television shows.
In my opinion, imagining capabilities and language skill upliftment by reading is more advantageous than watching television.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
Leisure time are usually spend on entertainment and personal developme...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...come independent from the monotonous job Moreover the reader begins to create ima...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Subsequently,
...velopment towards thought processing Subsequently the learning of new vocabularies is eas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'those cans'?
Suggestion: this can; those cans
...ictionary in the brain but also the way those can be used in different situations To illu...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41403508772 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87731279169 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589473684211 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 285.0 20.2975951904 1404% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1543.0 106.682146367 1446% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 285.0 20.7667163134 1372% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 82.0 7.06120827912 1161% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26387415313 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.26387415313 0.084324248473 313% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153552036736 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681317289962 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 146.6 13.0946893788 1120% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -226.26 50.2224549098 -451% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 115.6 11.3001002004 1023% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.58 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 21.98 8.58950901804 256% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 9.78957915832 582% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 116.0 10.1190380762 1146% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 116.0 10.7795591182 1076% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.