It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important.
Do you agree or disagree?
An increasing concern for many people around the world is environment problems. The world, cities, governments and societies chancing. When they are keeping changing some problems are comes out. Such as destroying wild life or pollution of cities.
Governments should arrange the balance among people and habitat of animals. Therefore, some associated of charity is established by governments.However, they aim is rearrange the wildlife which already devastated. Obviously, the governments should support to this establish. Some people believing, we should be respective the other lives. If we want to ensure balance between to side we have to know our borders.Such as, protective forest, stop killing the animals for just sport.
However, also some people believes wildlife is not vital. The vital point is developing the cities, communities. Moreover, this charity establish should be spend the money for increasing to education or healthy system because the human is superior type.
My point of view at this issue, I partially support both of side. The human is not alone in this world, the animal have been living in here maybe longer than us. The each individual and each animal could be stay here with perfect balance. The vital point is here respect to each other for both side. Due when the society developing the their life also they should be separate the land for other type.If the governments doing the policy relevant environment, it will provide a better life for future generations and natures. Thus, i believe, we be able to handle it with stay together.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...es, governments and societies chancing. When they are keeping changing some problems...
^^^^
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...f charity is established by governments.However, they aim is rearrange the wildlife whi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 340, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e should be respective the other lives. If we want to ensure balance between to si...
^^
Line 5, column 413, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Such
...een to side we have to know our borders.Such as, protective forest, stop killing the...
^^^^
Line 9, column 157, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spent'?
Suggestion: spent
...eover, this charity establish should be spend the money for increasing to education o...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 240, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ould be stay here with perfect balance. The vital point is here respect to each oth...
^^^
Line 13, column 333, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...h side. Due when the society developing the their life also they should be separate the l...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 401, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
...uld be separate the land for other type.If the governments doing the policy releva...
^^
Line 13, column 531, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...r future generations and natures. Thus, i believe, we be able to handle it with s...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1335.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25590551181 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80633279406 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594488188976 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.3682680514 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.1666666667 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1111111111 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0751696151756 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0234024531092 0.084324248473 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0247462722506 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0462474123277 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00517386646221 0.056905535591 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.