It's generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for music and sport, and others are not. However, it's sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.
Many sports stars and prestigious musicians who are well-known all around the world claim that they were born with talent. Meanwhile, some other people say that genius can be trained from very early ages. From my perspective, I will consider both ideas and also give my own opinion.
It is clear that gifted children or adults undoubtedly surprise people around them. Having said that, they can easily master sports facilities like they are pros, and use them in an incredible way that we will never expect them to be. However, probably due to this wonderful outcome, many people think that training for hours and self-discipline can also bring the same result. For instance, in The Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother, the most popular and also controversial book, Amy Chua wrote about her system for training her daughters to be musical prodigies. The oldest daughter successfully completed her mother's wish, but her younger sister rebelled, gave up and got into tennis instead.
Personally, in comparison to a well-trained artist or sports star, there is always a big difference that a born-talent person can bring. Their music, their way of playing, and also their personality, can all be shown naturally and cannot be faked. Having said that, this is the reason why people love and want to be like them so much.
In conclusion, where a person is born with talent or trained to be a pro, I hope they are happy with their own decision at the end of the day. No matter what their background is, the only crucial thing we care about is that they can make something great and better for the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an incredible way" with adverb for "incredible"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...lities like they are pros, and use them in an incredible way that we will never expect them to be. H...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80797101449 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53217843788 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626811594203 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9131250729 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.076923077 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264833751746 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879313803934 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570897836334 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160988916887 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230678039676 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.