It is too expensive to look after and repair old buildings. This money should be spent on building modern buildings instead.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In last few years, carrying and maintaining of old buildings have become too much expensive. It is thought by some people that instead of spending huge amount of money for aforementioned purpose, government should spend it on constructing latest buildings. I strongly agree with this view because it will improve lifestyle and economy of country too.
On the one hand, no one can deny the paramount importance of old buildings. In other words, they are symbol of custom, culture and history. So it is our chief responsibility of people to care for it to aware next generations about it. For an example, the TajMahal symbolize the innovative hardwork of workers and unconditional love of the King Mumtaz. However, too much monetary investment will not help to solve current burning issues and help society which supposed to be prime focus. Thus, the local authority should take care of buildings with limited budget only.
On the other hand, there are numerous benefits of investing funds to build high rise buildings. Firstly, if government builds multilayer buildings with all latest amenities, more people can get better accommodation and improve their lifestyle. Moreover, people can enjoy basic and latest facilities such as lifts, swimming pools, gym and so on. For an instance, the government of Gujarat has build 20 floors buildings to accommodate poor people of slum area which enhances quality of life. Secondly, an investment on building modern shopping malls makes it possible to not only generate more jobs but also helps customers to do shopping under one roof. Ultimately, it will help to boost economy of country owing to more employment in shops of malls.
In conclusion, while investment in maintaining old buildings is necessary, I believe the same funds should be invested to build latest buildings which will not only enhance lifestyle but also boost economy of country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'constructing the latest'.
Suggestion: constructing the latest
... purpose, government should spend it on constructing latest buildings. I strongly agree with this v...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'build the latest'.
Suggestion: build the latest
...ve the same funds should be invested to build latest buildings which will not only enhance l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19543973941 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78379880812 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599348534202 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5126562003 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6875 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1875 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271749813084 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807329431463 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729726199003 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178962801273 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585650942798 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.