It is too expensive to look after and repair old buildings. This money should be spent on building modern buildings instead.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the increase in population, the demand for residential as well as other places for leisure has increased. It is generally believed that exorbitant investment in the restoration of historical buildings should be redirected towards the establishment of new premises. In this essay, I shall refer to some sociological studies and examples, to discuss both pros and cons of spending money on the production of contemporary buildings.
To begin with, admittedly, ancient buildings entice the tourists from all over the world, therefore, contributing to the economic growth of the nation. For example, according to a report by Oxford, statistics state that about 20 percent of annual income is earned by the Tourism Industry of the US. Besides, such places are also enriched with cultural history which helps younger generations to acquire information about their cultures.
On the other hand, it is intuitively obvious the degraded quality of old structures would make them more prone to hazards in natural calamities. It would not only be precarious for that particular building, but also its surroundings. For example, research by the Times shows that, during the recent earthquake in Japan, the places that were badly affected are the ones where old buildings were in abundance. Moreover, an astronomical amount of money was spent to repair those buildings so that they could be saved from future catastrophic events. Thus, it is imperative to establish new buildings following risk prevention measures to ensure safety and utilizing the money in a proactive approach.
To conclude, in my opinion, although the preservation of historical buildings for the sake of rich cultural heritage and for the lucrative tourism industry is justified, the government should also take into consideration the need for the assembly of modern buildings, since the well-being of the population is a priority.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41750841751 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02027896857 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2422549515 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.083333333 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0833333333 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209945282131 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069420921165 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596867626095 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11693441363 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562973418968 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.