It is too expensive to look after and repair old buildings. This money should be spent on modern buildings instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is irrefutable that historical buildings are the manifestation of rich history, culture and traditions of the past. A section of society adheres that preserving obsolete buildings is mere a wastage of money as they need proper maintenance and repair, therefore, it is better to demolish them and construct modern buildings instead. This essay intends to demur the statement to large extent for several reasons elucidated in the ensuing segments.
First and foremost reason that why it is pertinent to preserve old building is that they attract the tourism which generates excellent revenue for the governments and thus boost is the economy of nations. Hotel Taj in Mumbai, for example, was a history building before which was later converted into 7 star hotel and proved a great source of income for country. As a result, it is better to to utilise old buildings in spite of reconstructing them.
Similarly, for the upcoming generations, old buildings are an asset heirlooms. To be more precise, if traditional buildings are looked after and maintained well, young generation may stay in touch with their ancestral values otherwise they may get deprived of their culture and history. Not only this but such buildings need maintenance therefore it opens job vistas also. By this I mean, when old buildings are converted in order to use it in a better way l; at the same time staff is also required to run that particular organisation. Nigeria, for instance, a well-known country for old buildings, started occupying most places to uplift the economy, open myriad of jobs for unemployed people and thus reduced the unemployment ratio.
However, some people believe that demolishing obsolete buildings is need of hour for constructing modern ones to keep pace with modernity. Nevertheless, only dilapidated building require to destroy for constructing the new ones. Therefore, demolishing the old buildings which require maintenance only is never commendable. In this case, many buildings do not attract the tourism due to bad infrastructure and incurs huge amount of money.
To recapitulate, I vehemently vouch that preserving old buildings is utmost important in order to maintain sheen of a particular heritage. whereas, the useless complexes which have no option to be used, should be modified into the modern ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 307, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hotel' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hotels'.
Suggestion: hotels
...e which was later converted into 7 star hotel and proved a great source of income for...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 388, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
... for country. As a result, it is better to to utilise old buildings in spite of recon...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...intenance therefore it opens job vistas also. By this I mean, when old buildings are...
^^^^
Line 5, column 139, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...aintain sheen of a particular heritage. whereas, the useless complexes which have no op...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, similarly, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for example, for instance, i mean, as a result, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1952.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24731182796 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97436731235 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569892473118 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8649288182 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.823529412 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8823529412 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.52941176471 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298716048443 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0996146537688 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427284424304 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170774390979 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360761575728 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.