Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since there is computer technology. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The onset of computer technology has resulted in many changes in our lifestyle. There are some people who are on the opinion that public reading places have now become redundant due with the spread of internet and that economic resources are getting wasted due to the cost spent for up-keep of such places while other do not agree with this observation. This essay will argue in detail how public libraries are still a preferred choice for many individuals.
To start with, access to information on computer requires high-speed internet. This is especially true in case the information is required for some analysis or thesis where numerous documents have to be referred to. Assuming that everyone would have the economic resources to procure a connection would be fool-hardy, as internet is still considered as a luxury, un-affordable by many. For instance, in a country like India, people have to shell-out a hefty sum to get access to decent internet connection for continuous streaming. As against this, libraries do not have pose any such cost related issues as most of the time, the registration is either free or is available at a nominal cost. It gives the reader the advantage of reading more than one book at a time with no connection to speed.
Another aspect which makes library a preferable choice for many is that it is free from unnecessary distractions like advertisements and pop-ups. In a library, there are no such distractions and so the reader can approach the subject of his interest with a calm mind and can focus without disturbances. For example, when children are browsing through net, there are several advertisements and pop-ups which offer them access to various other sites that are irrelevant to them. It tries to lure them away from the task at hand. Most schools therefore have well-stocked libraries to inculcate habit of reading among children, which in itself is a good habit.
To conclude, public libraries must be well-maintained because of the benefits they offer over computer technology including cost-effectiveness due to its lack of dependency on high-speed internet and avoiding pointless commercials and links to other websites which divert users, especially young children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 572, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'posed'.
Suggestion: posed
... As against this, libraries do not have pose any such cost related issues as most of...
^^^^
Line 3, column 797, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... at a time with no connection to speed. Another aspect which makes library a pre...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ivert users, especially young children.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1869.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16298342541 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95332291424 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560773480663 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.1575896377 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.6 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1333333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105570993088 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332123900589 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358139019261 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0734255432421 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440508616644 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.