Some people believe school children should be given multiple short vacations while others believe they should get one long vacation. Give advantage for both and your point of view
Schools across the globe have fixed vacation policies which often do not suit the parent's requirement. While some individuals are of the opinion that holidays at the end of each session is beneficial to
children, others disagree with this assessment and believe that one long vacation during the year is far better. This essay will discuss both these views while suggesting how they can be
can be implemented at schools, keeping in mind the child's age.
To begin with, the concept of multiple short holidays has positive effect on children. They are able to relax and come back to school far more refreshed and enthusiastic. Having said that, it would be
far more effective for younger children to be given intermittent vacations as they tend to get stressed and tired far more easily when compared to the older kids. For instance, children who
have just started school get easily tired and tend to throw tantrums. Such a holiday plan will help them cope with the school's curriculum and give them the much required breathing space.
As against the above benefit, taking a break for a long period helps parents and children plan a proper vacation and use these holidays judiciously. This is especially true with older children
who are more curious and want to visit new places and expand their horizon, instead to staying home during holidays. For example, In India, children are taught about the country's history including various buildings and
forts built by the Mughals which are located in Delhi. An informative trip like this will help them connect with their history and increase their understanding.
In conclusion, this essay discussed in detail how both types of vacation plans are suitable to children, considering their age groups. Short vacations are more suitable to younger children as they
help them destress while older children can look forward to spending quality time with parents while experiencing new places and connecting with the world around them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parents'' or 'parent's'?
Suggestion: parents'; parent's
...on policies which often do not suit the parents requirement. While some individuals are...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the end of each session is beneficial to children, others disagree with this asse...
^^^
Line 2, column 181, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'can be'.
Suggestion: can be
...h these views while suggesting how they can be can be implemented at schools, keeping in mind...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e views while suggesting how they can be can be implemented at schools, keeping i...
^^^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...husiastic. Having said that, it would be far more effective for younger children ...
^^^
Line 7, column 120, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
...liday plan will help them cope with the schools curriculum and give them the much requi...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... history including various buildings and forts built by the Mughals which are loc...
^^^
Line 13, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore suitable to younger children as they help them destress while older children ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14461538462 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49793097815 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575384615385 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3537681534 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.428571429 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 4.38176352705 251% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255998597089 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848545358823 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511385707828 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960725241654 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687675161387 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.