Governments all over the world aim to improve their citizens' living standard focusing on the economy. Although this a common and accepted policy, some claim that by following this road vital values are lost. The aim of this essay is to illustrate how economic development does actually bring benefits without destroying social values.
Developing a strong and sound economy has always been regarded as a priority by governments. Maintaining high living standard of the population is felt as a duty by many politicians who lead developed nations. When it comes to developing countries, where sometimes people struggle to survive or some areas are plagued by famine and drought, it is harder for politicians to guarantee decent living standard. Several factors are responsible for detrimental living conditions: low technological level, lack of an educational system, poor industrialization and the absence of reliable healthcare system. In the wake of the facts mentioned above, it is clear that the only way governments have to improve citizens' condition is to focus the effort on building a powerful economy. Every action takes its toll and in this case pollution, corruption and inequality should be taken into account. The way that leads to high living standard is an uphill battle but it is worth fighting it. It is essential to sustain free enterprises, funding science and to allocate adequate financial resources for the educational system.
Although industrialization is basically the only accepted and proved way that can lead to a general improvement of living standard, many claim that in the effort to accomplish this challenge, many values can be lost. The list of values on the brink of extinction is long and ranges from environmental concerns to corruption to consumerism. I think that every form of society has its own drawbacks. When it comes to people who live in underdeveloped countries, governments should of drastically improving living conditions a priority. Furthermore, it is completely wrong to affirm that countries that aim to focus on economic growth are lacking of social values. Respect, commitment, solidarity can exist also under fully capitalistic society. in every developed countries people create associations to help the needy or dedicate some of their spare time to support charity organizations.
In conclusion, from my point of view there is no evidence that investing resources in developing the economy can affect negatively the values at the base of our society. Wealth and financial stability are conditions every citizen should have a right to and therefore governments should take any necessary steps to improve the material conditions of the people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd drought, it is harder for politicians to guarantee decent living standard. Sev...
^^
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun claim seems to be countable; consider using: 'many claims'.
Suggestion: many claims
...general improvement of living standard, many claim that in the effort to accomplish this c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 744, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... also under fully capitalistic society. in every developed countries people create...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, so, therefore, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2283.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 425.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37176470588 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07699039586 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541176470588 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 728.1 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1536178756 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.15 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296921144213 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788041956599 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608629049172 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181716024397 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845508094887 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.