In many countries, criminal trials in law courts are being shown on television for the general public.
Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In many parts of the world, the trend of on-airing criminal prosecutions for people is blossoming at a very rapid pace. I believe it to be extremely disadvantageous not only in terms of affecting the delinquent's family but also in terms of raising questions on the criminal justice system. This essay will explore how these two mega-disadvantages have the potential to outshine any benefits.
Justice court proceedings on television bring forth a lot of mega-drawbacks. Firstly, this new trend has a deep impact on the lives of the criminal's kith and kin due to the stigma associated with them. As their children and wife approach to any organization, they face a lot of trouble and they are recognized as relatives of criminals. They are unable to secure a better position in schools and offices. This fact can be better explained with an example of a report related to broadcasting prosecution, which revealed that the recent surge in bullying of their families on the workplace and schools has been attributed to these trials programs on TV. Thus, this huge flaw has the potential to undermine any benefit by conducting open trials.
Secondly, viewers are more likely to form their own opinions related to the crime just based on their lack of understanding of the jury system. Since the trial board stands chances of being easily influenced by the media pressure as well as the viewer’s point of view. Take an example of Japan, where a recent survey revealed that the majority of Japanese prefer to take part in court trials and they want their opinions to be considered. Hence, it somehow leads to their biased ideas towards a problem.
However, the only minor advantage that I can relate to this development is that it gives a moral lesson to criminals and people to keep away from such activities and rectify themselves, but this benefit is extremely rare and elusive because a few people learn from real-life examples.
To sum up, from the above discussion, it can be concluded that the drawbacks of showing trials on media, especially in terms of affecting the credibility of their family members and developing mistrust on courts overshadow the minor advantage related to educating viewers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 201, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'delinquents'' or 'delinquent's'?
Suggestion: delinquents'; delinquent's
...eous not only in terms of affecting the delinquents family but also in terms of raising que...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'criminals'' or 'criminal's'?
Suggestion: criminals'; criminal's
...d has a deep impact on the lives of the criminals kith and kin due to the stigma associat...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, as to, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0406504065 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8954734115 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.6335195076 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160400967513 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484104927936 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415162935152 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867974917137 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352305927908 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.