In Many Countries, Paying For Things Using Mobile Phones Is Becoming Increasingly Common. Does this development have more advantages or more disadvantages?
While it is true, more and more people are increasingly adopting mobile payment methods for making a transaction, there are certain sections of society who still prefer the traditional method of transaction. In my view, there are many benefits to pay via a mobile phone, but there are some downsides which needed to be rectified before it can be trusted as a primary way of exchanging money. This essay will elucidate the disadvantages of transacting money through mobile wallet apps before reaching to a plausible conclusion.
It is an irrefutable fact that technology has not only changed the way people live, but also changed the way they transact with each other. However, many individuals still trust the traditional way of exchanging money like through cash or cheques. These individuals either unaware of these ways of transacting, or they find the user-interface of mobile wallet apps difficult to use. Furthermore, low paying labour who receives their payments or salary through cash finds it arduous to adopt mobile wallet apps. To sum up, mobile payment system is still unpopular in the low-salaried and uneducated section of society.
Another reason for the mobile payment apps not widely accepted is its dependence on the internet. Remote places where the internet connectivity is poor, people find it strenuous to transact through these apps. Moreover, security is also a big challenge to this method of money exchange. For an illustration, remarkable research conducted by the Internet Organisation of the USA reveals that more than 1 billion dollars have been stolen by hackers. Overall, there are some technical challenges with these mobile payment apps which have restricted the popularity of these apps among the general public.
To recapitulate, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that the mobile payment app methods are the future way of transacting money,
on the contrary, it hasn't reached to its potential in terms of usability and accessibility.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 586, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... the popularity of these apps among the general public. To recapitulate, the foregoing di...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are the future way of transacting money, on the contrary, it hasnt reached to its...
^^^
Line 10, column 21, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...ransacting money, on the contrary, it hasnt reached to its potential in terms of us...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, while, in my view, it is true, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33650793651 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91385341055 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561904761905 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7773495901 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.071428571 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180375093589 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600305641574 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454584683349 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0873487241785 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0779383814939 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.