In many countries, the quality of life in the large cities is becoming worse.
What causes this problem?
What measure can be taken to solve it?
Compromised Life standard in metropolitans is often at the top of the agenda throughout the world as the leading problem in the 21st century. This essay will explore how excessive garbage and environmental pollution are the major contributing factors are affecting the quality of life, and how through an awareness campaign and proper town planning by the governmental elite, this issue can be curtailed.
There are myriad factors that are considered responsible for igniting problems in large cities.
Firstly, people in densely populated areas produce excessive garbage, which serves as a medium for the growth of disease-causing bacteria because of a lack of proper waste management. These bacteria mix with fresh drinking water and cause fatal diseases in children and adults. Take an example of India, where multiple tons of garbage are produced each day that is improperly disposed of, results in the outburst of endemic diseases. Thus, the production of a large quantity of waste is the fueling force behind poor city life.
Secondly, industrialization is considered a breeding ground for a decrease in quality of life. As smoke and poisonous gases emitted from industries mix with the air is the sole major reason behind air pollution. Industrial smoke causes lung diseases such as asthma, and lung cancer. For example, the air samples taken from large cities have been found to have higher proportions of poisonous gases. Hence, industrial development does fuel this issue.
However, there are certain pragmatic measures that can be taken to raise the quality of life in big cities. The awareness cultivation programs for waste management in schools and offices would certainly prove effective in combating hazardous conditions in urban centres. Furthermore, viable management of the town by giving basic facilities to stop migration from rural to urban areas would also be a better alternative. Through shifting industries to the suburbs, the quality of life in cities can be upgraded.
To sum up, even though mismanagement of waste and industrialization are the widespread cause, but through education and proper town and city planning, this problem can be curbed.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1858.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41690962099 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93057303163 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7839623431 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.294117647 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1764705882 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248158563828 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787207718396 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709135989624 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121192971458 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406490631652 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.