In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend?
With the advent of modern cities and growing population, living spaces have become small, consequently joint family is a rarity. This essay argues that this is a positive trend because of low financial cost and more freedom in nuclear families. First, the essay will discuss why small family units are financially more stable, then it will put some light on why more freedom and private space is essential.
In past years, the cost of living has risen up that is why it is essential for everyone at home to earn money. Previously, not everyone at home used to contribute to household spends but nowadays it is not possible to run a house on a single person’s earning that is why the cost of maintaining a small family is low. Therefore, the money left can be used for the betterment of children’s education or on other development activities such as sports. Additionally, savings of a small family are more and thus it becomes easy for a small family to deal with hospital expenses.
Large family needs more space, therefore, individual private space becomes small. This leads to constant interference of others and becomes the reason for the unrest. For example, if there are children of different ages at home and one child wants to study but the other wants to play a video game on full volume then this creates a problem for both of the children. Also, everyone requires some private space for creativity and other important routines. Plus, individuals can make their own decisions without any approval of other members.
In conclusion, our cities have more and more small family units now and this in my opinion is a positive trend because nuclear families are more economically sound and have more private space which has led to a better life style among people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.875 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65222166841 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542763157895 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7702797094 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183861182569 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716820845082 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619821088572 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126575608682 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466308409233 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.