In many countries the tradition of families having meals together is disappearing. Why is this happen? What will be the effects of it to the family and to the society?
In today’s fast moving world, where societies are leaving behind the noble tradition of family meal time. There are numerous reasons behind this negative development and might have devastating social consequences in longer run. In this essay I shall present both causes as well as the consequence of this problem.
Firstly, the most fundamental reason behind families to avoid eating together is lack of time, due to extremely busy working hours in ever increasing competition in the society. Secondly, in the past, habit of eating along with loved ones used to be ingrained right from childhood, which in contrary to present times, has no prominence to such a culture. Furthermore, act of having family meals was considered a way of sharing love and compassion. Whereas, in today’s time it is considered as just another means of survival having no importance. Thirdly, in the past, elderly people of a family used to enforce family policies on younger generation to have meals together. Such strict family laws are no more imposed as elders themselves do not have ample time in their busy schedule.
On the other hand, getting away with such a beautiful tradition will definitely have negative consequence such as weaker family bonding leading to, lesser love and compassion towards loved ones. More importantly, if adolescents and children are not tracked with their eating habits might result in consuming junk food resulting in health related concerns such as obesity, diabetes etc. On the contrary, if meals are eaten together then younger generation can be informed about healthy eating habits. Above all, leaving one habit might lead to progressively getting away with other family activities such as family gathering etc. leading to isolation and in extreme cases to depression.
To conclude, as with many other traditions, the custom of having meal with families is being voided due to numerous worldly reasons. This is leading to various social problems in the form of lesser emotional bonding and decreased love among families. However, such negative trend can be addressed by elderly people of a family by reinitiating such acts of improved family bonding.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 276, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... this essay I shall present both causes as well as the consequence of this problem. Fir...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, well, whereas, such as, as well as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27507163324 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73087699861 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561604584527 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7199256695 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.294117647 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5294117647 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.17647058824 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296636426195 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980406594724 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652703334892 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191300980542 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302188378191 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.