In many countries the tradition of families having meals together is disappearing. Why is this happen? What will be the effects of it to the family and to the society?
In today’s fast-moving world, family traditions are changing. family meal time used to be a time where all the family members sit together and spent time with each other and discuss their all day long activities. There are enormous reasons behind this negative trend and might have devastating effects on the children. In this essay, I will share both the causes and effects of this changing trend.
Firstly, nowadays people do not have time to spend with their families. They are pretty much occupied with their work in order to grow the corporate ladder as soon as possible resulting in leaving them occupied with their work. Secondly, in earlier times elder members of the family used to enforce family policies on the younger generation to have meals together. However, in the present day scenario, even the older generation does not have ample time to follow or impose such rules. Furthermore, in the past, a habit of eating meals with family was associated with love, compassion, respect for each other and was ingrained right from childhood which is contrary to present times has no prominence to such a culture.
On the other hand, getting away with such a beautiful tradition will only have negative concerns such as weaker family bonding, lesser love and compassion towards each other. More importantly, if the children and adolescents are not tracked with their eating habits can lead them to several health issues such as diabetes, obesity etc. On the contrary, if meals are taken together with the family, healthy eating habits can be inculcated in the children right from childhood.
To conclude, the custom of having meals together with the family is being voided due to numerous reasons. this is leading to weaker family ties, less emotional bonding and decrease love among family members. However, this can be addressed by reinitiating the acts of improved family bonding.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Family
... world, family traditions are changing. family meal time used to be a time where all t...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 106, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...s being voided due to numerous reasons. this is leading to weaker family ties, less ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08333333333 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49532765224 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560897435897 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8252083725 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.733333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297631470968 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116585565816 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737769633205 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216553605596 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0968703338928 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.