In many countries, women and men are working full time. It is therefore logical for women and men to share household chores. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give relevant examples

Essay topics:

In many countries, women and men are working full time. It is therefore logical for women and men to share household chores. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give relevant examples

In numerous nations, both men and women do a full-time job for their living. Hence, it is practical to share household chores among themselves. I strongly agree with this statement because it benefits them to develop a strong bonding and this will save extra time to spend with their children.

Sharing household tasks between working couples is vital because this helps to improve closeness among them. Helping each other has an incredible advantage, to achieve a concrete bonding between husband and wife. For example, in 2002, a survey conducted by Elite Institute of Japan disclosed that couples who share their house duties are more successful to keep their relationship stronger compared to those who do not.

Male and Females spend their whole day at work and hence they work hand in hand with each other to complete household tasks because this will save enough time for their children. This is to say, if couples do their home tasks with each other’s help they are most likely to spend precious time with their kids and as a result, they will live a happier life with an emotion connected with their kids. For example, in China, 100% of parents spend their valuable time with their children besides they share their household chores. This result, they have a perfect life balance between work and family life.

To conclude, sharing household chores with husband and wife is the best approach for a working couple because this will help them to produce a healthy emotional bonding with each other and it will keep an additional time with their young ones.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, hence, if, for example, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95471698113 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3130690346 2.80592935109 82% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520754716981 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2151788887 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.363636364 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151004662059 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796547701935 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725746620251 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1124271772 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529718382447 0.056905535591 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.