Should museums and art galleries be free of charge for the general public, or should a charge, even a voluntary charge, be levied for admittance?
Discuss this issue, and give your opinion
Some people argue that to get access to art museums an entrance fee or a voluntary cost should be taken from the people; while others say that, it should be free of cost. While free accessibility to museums is the best way to display the art to invite more tourists from all corners of the world, I believe to admit a minimum charge to be taken from the people because the government can invest more for maintenance.
On the one hand, people should access museums free of cost because this is the main attraction for tourists across the globe. This is to say, tourists from all over the world will be more enthusiastic to visit this place because it is free. There is also a benefit, due to this; individuals will learn massive knowledge about history. For instance, In Thailand, there is a museum called the golden gate, which is made of mud with ancient war equipment’s, and the age of this is 124 years. As per China times, due to lack of funds, they are facing difficulties to maintain it.
On the other hand, some say that people should be charged to get access to museums because it will help the government to keep the maintenance level at high standards. This means, with the money collected from sightseers will be invested to maintain the look of the museum. As a result, it will stay stronger for a longer period. For example, the Dragon house of Goa is one of the first museums in India. This is of dragon skeletons and they look new every year because of the proper maintenance. They charge a minimal amount of 10 rupees each for each individual and hence, they are capable of keeping it stronger for more than 200 decades.
In conclusion, some say cost must be there to enter museums while others say it should be free. However, I believe there should be a minimum cost to access these antique places because of maintenance in order to serve you better for more generations.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, look, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58064516129 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50895490302 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483870967742 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9772521783 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.133333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7333333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302137804605 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110770695531 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628040240213 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212045250878 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224854665391 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 9.78957915832 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.