In many countries, women and men are working full-time. It is therefore, logical for women and men to share household tasks. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
As we are living in twenty-first century in which male and female are working to support their family. I completely agree with view-point that both of them should do all household together because equal rights must be ensured to both genders in domestic life and careers.
Since the innovation in technology and science have been resulted from the efforts of both, men and women. both are striving towards excellence to support their children. As they have offered full-time positions and perform well in their jobs so, there must not be any discrimination in doing work at home. For instance; these are not only women who make food for entire family. Now-a-days men have been involved in cookery and work as chef in renowned hotels and restaurants of the world.
At present, in order to have a better living standards both genders are exerting their full efforts to mastering up their skills to compete in this competitive job market. If a female can become a gaming programmer or construction engineer then why not men can be a textile designer, a tailor, a cleaner or a better nurse. As both sexes are working regardless of any discrimination then men can clean the whole house, do some laundry stuff, can do dishwashing and related stuff. In the same way, women can go outside to do grocery, drive a car or may go for MOT service.
To conclude, there is no doubt that equity must be ensured in all matters of life and men should not allow to underestimate the power of women. both genders should be provided with equal chances for growth at work and they must do all domestic tasks together.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Both
...rom the efforts of both, men and women. both are striving towards excellence to supp...
^^^^
Line 6, column 108, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'underestimating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: underestimating
...atters of life and men should not allow to underestimate the power of women. both genders should...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 144, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Both
...ow to underestimate the power of women. both genders should be provided with equal c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, then, well, for instance, no doubt, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74551971326 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6229507249 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.842657162 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.846153846 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23030381601 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814081877706 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421771837539 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139667206347 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048083831723 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.