Many governments in the world spend large amounts of money on art, which helps to improve the quality of people’s lives. However, governments should spend money on other things rather than art. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion.
Numerous governments world-wide are spending staggeringly large amounts of their monetary resources on promotion of arts in general with the aim of elevating levels of living quality. Some argue that this is not efficient and the money should be spent on other fields. While I can understand the concerns of the latter group, it seems crucial to invest in art which subsequently benefits quality of people’s lives.
We are living in times that family finances are an overwhelmingly increasing concern bore by large portions of the communities. Businesses are becoming stricter and challenging to succeed in and the people are working tirelessly to maintain their financial standings. With governmental assistance, the prosperity of entrepreneurs and employees can be better assured. Wise allocation of monetary resources to aid the businesses will insure success of all parties in the business. There are numerous examples of countries that flourished their economy with well-managed financial investments from the governments.
On the other hand, there are growing concerns regarding deterioration of cultural values that are linked to the weakened status of art in general amongst the population. Providing financial assistance to artists and investing in promoting arts within a society boosts various aspects of life quality. Any given society that has maintained its touch with fine-arts is arguably more culturally integrated and will benefit greatly from the endeavors of artists. It can be easily observed that the countries trying to invest in arts suffer less from communal disharmony and cultural identity disorders.
Overall, as it is the case for almost entire societal issues, maintaining the balance is of utmost importance. Therefore, I would have to disagree with the omission of governmental funding towards arts in general. While the people’s concerns for the finances are valid, the subtle and intricate role that arts play in our quality of living cannot be disregarded. A community benefiting from constructive art interactions is bound to be more successful compared to its counterparts.
Comments
7.5?
7.5?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 177, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'succeeding'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: succeeding
...s are becoming stricter and challenging to succeed in and the people are working tirelessl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58823529412 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10182728652 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582043343653 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.1745940752 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.8125 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198685567586 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582891641919 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564973150563 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13002885425 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106323206852 0.056905535591 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.