Every year several languages die out. Some people believe that it is not important as life will be easier with fewer languages.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Annually, numerous languages are disappearing worldwide. While some people claim that this issue is not of great importance due to the induced lingual uniformity, many argue to the contrary and are making efforts to prevent this phenomenon. This essay investigates the mentioned topic and ascertains why it is beneficial to help exotic languages survive.
From an international communication perspective, a smaller diversification of practiced languages will positively affect the ease of communication. Hypothetically, if in the world there was a sole language, there would be almost no misinterpretations or barriers holding interpersonal communications aback. As some instances of this, firstly, companies that share a common language are able to collaborate more efficiently and conserve time as well as resources, secondly, communities that are populated with speakers of a single language, tend to demonstrate a more integrated unity. To those ends, pupils are often taught English as the second language so that they are able to strive in the international business community.
From a cultural standpoint, it is crucial to assist frail languages with low counts of practitioners to survive our cutting edge times. Staggering volumes of poetry, literature, ancient manuscripts, as well as historical logs, are recorded in authentic languages which are on the verge of oblivion. While they might not be completely lost to mankind if the respective language has died, it certainly affects the quality of interpretations. Furthermore, assisting a language in decline will in turn aid preserving that culture from obliteration. As an example, many African countries have received international aids and assistance to keep their authentic languages from decay and made applaudable efforts towards this goal.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that it is of utmost importance to prevent the death of languages. Not only they are the basis for their respective cultures, but their historical heritage will also suffer given that the language was not to be used anymore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61919504644 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33690122069 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609907120743 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1075625455 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.642857143 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163760749538 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535984844003 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0260308318154 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982031917483 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236813243374 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.