Many museums charge for admission while others are free.
Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museum outweigh the disadvantages?
Some museums can be accessed at no cost whereas others require an access fee from visitors. While museums that charge tend to have lower patronage and may not be too popular, they will have some funds for maintenance and they are more secure. Ultimately, I think it is more beneficial for museums to charge for admission.
Making people pay entry fees at museums might have some downsides. Firstly, fewer people will tend to patronise such museums. In other words, since many people are cost sensitive and appreciate freebies more, they will rather prefer to patronise free museums. For instance, it was once reported that the number of people visiting a Museum in Ile-Ife reduced after an admission fee was introduced. In addition, such charges might negatively affect the popularity of the museum. This is because more people will naturally like to visit free museums, so they might talk more about the free ones than they do with the ones that charge, thereby reducing the popularity and fame of the museums that require payments.
On the other hand, a lot of significant benefits are associated with museums that charge. The charges can serve as a reliable source of income to allow proper maintenance. If the museums do not charge the visitors, who will bear the maintenance cost? The access fees can be used in keeping the museums in their best conditions. Examples of maintenance that can be done include fixing of broken statues, replacement of old and faulty doors and cleaning of the facilities. Furthermore, paying to gain entrance into a museum can make it more secured. Making it free for all might be risky considering the valuable items kept in the museum and the lives of the visitors or tourists. Charging can be a good strategy to ensure that a museum is accessed by only committed and serious people with a level of trust.
In conclusion, even though free museums are popular and can easily attract customers, it pays more for museums to charge so as to maintain good standards and ensure a high level of security. I think most people will appreciate secured and efficient museums more, thus, it is highly expedient for museums to charge their customers before admitting them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ers, it pays more for museums to charge so as to maintain good standards and ensure a hi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, whereas, while, as to, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1835.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93279569892 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56051032922 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518817204301 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8146331363 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5789473684 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5789473684 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15789473684 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397926465994 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134937056059 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840058100275 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268959568208 0.151304729494 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286265459032 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.