Some people believe that unpaid community services should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
General societal development is not meant to be the sole responsibility of the government. Thus, free services from the community is required and this needs to be mandatory aspect of what is being done in post-secondary institutions. Even though such free services can be a source of distraction to high school students, I agree they should be a compulsory part of the school because it makes the students more responsible by giving to humanity which is rewarding at the end of the day and also, it makes the students better time managers.
The major purpose of schooling is to study and learn, taking up additional task such as free charity job, environmental enhancement like cleaning and free children sport trainings can distract the students. Academic workload is usually cumbersome and distractions from community services when not well managed can negatively affect the results of some students.
However, services rendered to the society is highly appreciated and it is a great responsibility. This prepares the scholars involved for the future. Furthermore, since community development services is an act of giving, making it mandatory will help the students to imbibe the act of giving which comes with its rewards. Such rewards can be job oppourtunities, connection, business and even finance oppourtunities.
In addition to the point raised, making free community work obligatory will help high school students to be better time managers. Since this added responsibility will take some of their time, so as to avoid any negative result, the students will be forced to find ways to manage their time more effectively. Examples of these ways include prioritizing, making use of to-do list and saying no when required.
In conclusion, taking up the task of rendering free services to the community should be a must for high school students. This is an effective way to prepare the scholars for leadership and the great future ahead.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...nsibility will take some of their time, so as to avoid any negative result, the students...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, second, so, thus, well, as to, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22929936306 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03835008853 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531847133758 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6345384223 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.285714286 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224461014459 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797876022024 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539039968896 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130579781108 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479266089011 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.