Many people believe that it’s better to learn something in a group rather than individually. Do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, there is a colossal upsurge in the trend to see the individuals discussing that, learning in a gang is highly beneficial. Whilst, others claim that reading alone would be helpful. Thereby, I agree with the former viewpoint, and in this essay, I shall shed some lights on both the sides of the argument by analysing it.
On the one hand, compelling pieces of evidence prove that pursuing something along with a team is greater than studying individually. Firstly, it brings up good co-ordination and interactive learning, where everyone to share their own method of learning, hence it brings tricks and tips which could make the subject to be learned easily. For example, if a student preparing for Board exam, it would take a lot of time and patience to revise everything on the whole, and this can be eased by picking up their individual topics and share it with one another in a group. Consequently, they could finish learning easily and without boring.
On the other hand, people across the board discriminates the aforementioned with were it as some downsides. First, while preparing individually it enhanceS the concentration, but while preparing in a group would bring some distractions. Moreover, people get more convenience and comfort while preparing from their own pace. This gives them the freedom to learn. For example, a person can learn by speaking it in a loud voice or body gestures, which won't' make them feel stupid. However, there are concerns about self-distractions and perplexed while learning anything newly.
In conclusion, learning in a group is highly beneficial than reading alone. Ergo, its contrary can be overlooked or curbed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 82, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...d discriminates the aforementioned with were it as some downsides. First, while prep...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, moreover, so, while, for example, in conclusion, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90363124039 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610909090909 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4133146782 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136783229862 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463266916103 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399093466022 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0830012628301 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241690414431 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.