Many people believe that it's better to learn something in a group rather than individually.
Do you agree or disagree?
An interesting feature of the 21st century is the general acceptance of acquisition of knowledge as a life necessity. Some people argue that it is much more preferable to grasp an understanding of what is taught in a gathering rather than on an individual basis, and I strongly agree with this viewpoint. This discourse will explore the rationale behind my argument in the following paragraphs.
One of the significant reasons why group learning is more appropriate is that it makes studying a fun affair. This is due to the fact that studying in a group is less boring and more amusing most learners. In other words, reading with study partners is a great way to liven up one’s learning sessions. For example, a recent survey by Institute Association of Learners, had shown that studying in a group helps to boost students’ assimilation level by 65%. Evidently, it is clear that joining a study
group tends to make studying lively.
Another justification for my point of view is because studying in a company of others aids in sharing of talents. The reason for this is that this participation assists in the distribution of special skills within the group. To put simply, when people come together to learn, this kind of gathering involves people with different gifts, and as they study together, often times discuss and share their knowledge which results in distribution such gifts to one another, and at the end of the day, they all obtain or learn much more than they would have done individually. For instance, my sister enrolled to acquire bread making skills which subsequently resulted in her learning the art of decorations and designs of pastries.
In conclusion, I reiterate that I completely concur that studying in assembly of other learners is greater effective as against personal basis because it brings about assimilating with leisure, and also, helps in divulging expertise between group members. Therefore, I recommend that students should endeavor to imbibe this form of learning in the studies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng a study group tends to make studying lively. Another justification for my ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09281437126 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87895853347 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583832335329 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.6176426217 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144204692933 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461811847164 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419598606241 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.077736284291 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208630193899 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.