Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is an argument whether or not reformed ex-prisoners should be in a better position to speak to teenagers about the repercussion of criminal offences, and therefore discourage them from breaking the law. This discourse agrees that they are the best people to do so since they have experienced the punishment. Notwithstanding, these and more will be explored, accordingly.
Undoubtedly, some exponents are of the view that those previously convicted are not in a better position to offer a good advice. Apparently, the rationale behind their stance might possibly be because of the adage that says "once a criminal is always a criminal". In other words, ex-prisoners has nothing positive to render to this young adolescents, and after serving this prison terms, they have neither ambition nor source of livelihood; hence, they end up committing more felony later on. Take for instance, my cousin, Emeka, who was imprisoned for murder, and after serving the allocated jail term; consequently, could no longer live a normal and productive life since 10 years of his discharge. Therefore, from the above, it is evident that an ex-convict would end up misleading this young adult if he has nothing positive to offer.
However, taking a look from the flip side, could the contenders of the view that allowing such people to speak to teenagers about their experiences be absolutely right? Certainly, the rationalization behind their argument might be because those people have experienced punishment associated with these crimes, and hence will be able to educate as well as discourage young people from threading on such path. A good example illustrating this is a survey conducted by Association of Corporal Punishers in Nigeria, in 2018, on the impact of reformed-offenders admonishing teenagers, it revealed that it has 89% success rate. Hence, from this it is obvious that adolescent people are more likely to accept advice from someone who can speak
from experience.
In conclusion, having explored both vantage points, I completely consent to the hilt that people who have turned their lives around after serving a prison sentence could help to deter teenagers from committing crimes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
There is an argument whether or not reformed ex-prisoners should be in a be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'good advice'.
Suggestion: good advice
...d are not in a better position to offer a good advice. Apparently, the rationale behind their...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: MIGHT_PERHAPS[1]
Message: Use simply 'might', 'possibly'.
Suggestion: might; possibly
...ntly, the rationale behind their stance might possibly be because of the adage that says &apos...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'might'.
Suggestion: might
...ntly, the rationale behind their stance might possibly be because of the adage that says &apos...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, apparently, consequently, hence, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1861.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31714285714 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02754834472 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577142857143 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.5393062214 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.153846154 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9230769231 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8461538462 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1916603575 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676703466805 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053740739731 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132427375445 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039603906185 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.