Many people believe that media coverage of celebrities is having a negative effect on children.
To what extent do you agree?
Nowadays, the media coverage of famous people have increased evidently. While some people think that the news coverage of the celebrities is affecting badly to the children, others people are against it. In this essay, I certainly agree with the former view and in this essay I will discuss both arguments and explain my view with relevant examples.
To start with, although the daily updates by media for popular personalities might be impacting children, it help their kids to be more popular automatically. For instance, the star kids can be easily launched as an actor because they already have their own fandom. On the other hand, some children get encouraged to pursue a career in entertainment, sports, and many other fields in which they positively achieve their goals. Furthermore, many other adolescents if has any interest in journalism, they become the ones who are behind the cameras.
However, some of the star kids or any civilian kids get discouraged as they lose confidence and eventually fell into mental health traps. For instance, the newly launched kids' movie gets flop on theatres because they might not meet expectations compared to their parents. Also, people waste their time keeping update their favorite personalities or crazily following them around. Additionally, such a trending craze has become pious as fans invade people’s privacy and securities.
To sum up, I completely agree that even though media helps us to keep up for the latest information of the celebrities, it has negative impacts on all children whether be it as star kids or non-star kids.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 110, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...alities might be impacting children, it help their kids to be more popular automatic...
^^^^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...s who are behind the cameras. However, some of the star kids or any civilian kids get disc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er be it as star kids or non-star kids.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, while, for instance, in my view, to start with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15057915058 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77418433892 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633204633205 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8137632032 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.166666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174379910189 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683608685194 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070372930005 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109069912575 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669809153681 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.