No one can deny that learning sports plays a vital role in school. Even in schools, regular periods for having sports lessons for boys are girls are commonly seen. It is agreed that sport lessons are indeed important to be included in school timetable. Analyzing that playing games will fortify the health of the school children as well as it is advisable for the young children to have some relaxation from the rote-learning, inclusive of sport lessons in school timetable can be shown.
One reason to support is to eliminate few dreadful diseases like obesity, chronic diseases which is seen in young children nowadays. For example, it is commonly seen that the today’s generation faces health disorder such as over-weight, high blood level in kinder-garden class itself and kids are being affected for their lifetime. Unfortunately, we are not giving equal importance to our health prospects and concentrated only on academic achievements. Thus, it is clear that we have to give equal importance to enhance children’s health as there is a saying “Health is wealth”.
Another point to consider that a child should have some playtime for themselves during school hours than having to follow the rote-learning syllabus. For instance, Canadian academic syllabus follows an equal amount of school time in learning and implementing sports for all children irrespective of their gender. Not only does it rejuvenate the kid, but also it is proved that it can strength the academic performance during formal assessment. Because of this, it is evident that how inclusive of sport lesson is efficient for the children.
To conclude, including sport lessons in school timetable can improve the performance of school kid in their academics as well as in games. Thus, it is clear why it is necessary to have sport lessons is a key in school timetable. After analyzing this subject, it is predicted that the positive aspects of the debate over the rote-learning be stronger than the negative ones and because of this, it is believed that sports lessons are significant in school timetable.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20294117647 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93763757684 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508823529412 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1606308661 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.933333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13333333333 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186338668682 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813643622783 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748148547017 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12839512616 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082660506265 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.