Many people believe that we should protect all wild animals while others believe we should just protect some of them.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is often been a point of debate that a section of society is in the view of protecting entire spices of wild animals, whereas, others opine that only a few of them should be taken into consideration of protection. In the below essay, I will argue on both sides with my perspective.
On the one hand, people are in view of supporting and taking care of all animals which are existing on the planet, the reason behind this is they are also part of the earth. In other words, unlike humans, their habitat is also made by nature, so it is our responsibility that we should offer them some kind of secured space for themselves where they live there life. For example, according to mythology, God has made this universe and plants, animals and human are the creation and need of the globe.
On the other hand, the opponent thinks that only some animals should be protected because dangerous spices are harmful to human life. Since for their survival, they are killing people are which will have a detrimental effect on the existence of humans on earth that’s why people feel if the less dire animals will be there and can be controlled as per human needs and requirement. For example, it is been proven by many scientists that human-races are the most selfish in nature and they module the things according to their way of living. Therefore, the only motive behind giving protection to some spices is that human should be safe and can control as per their understanding.
In my opinion, each one of us has the rights to leave and people should not modify selfishly by taken life of animals. There is a certain precaution which can take like not building human-habitat near the animal living rather than killing them.
To conclude, different people have a difference in opinion of protecting wild spices but unlike humans there also the creation of God. People should not kill them only because such animals can be dire to human life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, whereas, for example, kind of, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70967741935 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49507215499 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507331378299 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.5331583108 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.538461538 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2307692308 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262170985624 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989879075187 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569826378016 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152892964665 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260153960296 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.