Many people join distance learning programmes study material post TV Internet and study at home but some people think that it cannot bring the same benefit as attending colleges or universities does Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Many people join distance-learning programmes (study material, post, TV, Internet) and study at home, but some people think that it cannot bring the same benefit as attending colleges or universities does.

Do you agree or disagree?

Education is perhaps the most important ingredient to happy, successful and constructive life. It is a key which will unlock numerous doors that will lead to success. An educated person has a lot of job opportunities waiting on the other side of the door. With the advancement in technology like computers and internet colleges and educational institutes not only teaching students through traditional classroom method, but also, also provide an opportunity to the students of distance education method. There are many denizens who have an opinion that the distance learning program is far more beneficial, while others believe that the traditional classroom method of teaching is more effective. Whether the people should join the distance learning program or the traditional classroom method? This will be discussed further in this essay.

Many people have an opinion that studying through the modern methods such as the internet or joining the course online provides numerous benefits to the students. The students will not be required to pay expensive tuition fees, cost of the textbooks or administration fees as all the material will be available online and will be easily downloadable. Additionally, they will not have to incur the travelling cost from home to the college for studying. Furthermore, the disciples will have the opportunity to work part time or full-time side by side doing the distance education course, thus they will also gain practical experience apart from the theoretical knowledge.

On the contrary, the traditional classroom method provides an opportunity to the students for face to face interaction with the teacher corrects, teaches, guide and motivates them and thus they can build a good career path. Moreover, If the students have any doubts related to a topic the lecturers can readily offer the necessary clarifications and thus, they get a deeper insight into the subject. By attending the classes regularly can enhance some necessary skills. For instance, by effectively listening in the classroom and participating in classroom activities, many skills like presentation, problem solving, communication skills can be improved.

To conclude, the advantages of the traditional classroom teaching methods outweighs the advantaged of the advantages of modern distance learning method. Although the distance education method helps to avoid the unnecessary cost but it does not help in the development of the overall skills and experience of the students

Votes
Average: 7.4 (6 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 576, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to program'
Suggestion: to program
...e an opinion that the distance learning program is far more beneficial, while others be...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 751, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to program'
Suggestion: to program
...eople should join the distance learning program or the traditional classroom method? Th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...iples will have the opportunity to work part time or full-time side by side doing the dis...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll skills and experience of the students
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, while, apart from, for instance, such as, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2114.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 385.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49090909091 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00200191821 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519480519481 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 657.0 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5658456282 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.352941176 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6470588235 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111238966069 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414887042213 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056710573815 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0647476353108 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032183013697 0.056905535591 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.