MANY PEOPLE NOW LIVE IN SOCIETIES WHERE CONSUMER GOODS HAVE BECOME CHEAP.
WHAT ARE THE ADVANTAGES THE DISADVENTAGES?
This essay will firstly discuss cheap prices of consumer goods in societies people now live as an advantage. Secondly, this essay will discuss how this may lead to some problems as a primary disadvantage.
On the one hand, the main advantage of consumer cheap prices is that consumer goods, such as clothing goods, food, durable and non-durable consumer goods can be reachable for society. Moreover, even poor people whose annual income doesn’t match the level of declared average income, can afford to buy consumer goods and be integrated in community entirely. This is an issue of utmost importance when low prices give opportunity for all society stratum, no matter their income amount, to be able to subsist on and settle their daily feeding problems. Nevertheless, in this point of view it is also extremely important to have affordable prices for clothes and wearing in terms of social integration.
On the other hand, the primary disadvantage of customer goods cheap prices in my opinion is it’s low quality. I’m certain that high qualified goods cannot be cheap. As a matter of fact, every good has an estimate price and the main intention of all manufacturers and food producers is to gain profit from their production. Hence, when I see in stores surprisingly cheap goods, I understand that it may have a suspicious quality and I eschew purchasing it, inasmuch as low qualitative good can damage health cause a lot of chronic diseases. The same is true about clothing goods. For example, high quality clothes are always expensive and the low quality clothes, quite the contrary. Meanwhile, low quality clothes, as well as the other cheap non-durable goods are being spoiled very soon and in main circumstances consumers are discontent from their transactions.
In conclusion, as if to emphasize both advantages and disadvantages of consumer goods cheap prices, I would like to mention, that although cheap goods are approachable and create equilibrium in society, buy on the other hand they have bad quality, which in it’s turn can destroy customers’ health. However, in my point of view, it would be beneficial to buy expensive and high quality customer goods, if of course you can afford yourself.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, of course, such as, as a matter of fact, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1876.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15384615385 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86302226853 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.6459073208 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.066666667 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2666666667 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.6 7.06120827912 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227512562586 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816064243764 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854030193384 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148513647119 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206702537117 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.