Nowdays, more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face. Is this a positive or negative development?
In this day and age we prefer online platforms rather then real life when it comes to communications. There are several obvious benefits in this new lifestyle though it may have extrimely bad consequances as well. As widely known fact if we adopt this approach we may benefit only in short term. But the long Term consequences will effect our society negatively which will probably take over the possitive ones.
Speaking of positives we count time efficiency and joy. For example the online platforms make our social life more sophsticated and more enjoyable. There are numerous tools prepared for that such as emotional smileys, information sharing possibilities, dozens of shortcuts for different reasons and all of them are prepared to make our diving is network more entertaining and simple. This simple ways of our self expression are very time efficient as many of them can be done by just one click of a button. This possiblities are so engaging that many people prefer to socialize through technologies over face to face communication. More ofthen than not it is clear to notice that people are more integrated with their online life than with the real one which in the long run causes in development of negative habbits and consequences.
One of the evident drawbacks is addiction to online life which effects on real-life communication skills. Social platforms create an artificial envirement where the user always has more attention, importance and recognition to compare to the real life. It is also well known fact that receiving feedback every time creates a dose of dopamine which is responsible for our happy feeling and users become easily addicted to not real happiness by receiving this doze in bigger quantities than being used to. As a result the time spent online starts to take over the moments lived in the real life and human pshycology starts to experience a regression in non-virtual communication skills. Also attending real life events starts to be uncomforatble and unusual where the need of artificial happiness results in depression and stress which can even lead to paranoia.
To sum up all in one, being online can be benefitial sometimes, but with no control on spending time there will effect our real life and even pshycology negatively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...d age we prefer online platforms rather then real life when it comes to communicatio...
^^^^
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...rm. But the long Term consequences will effect our society negatively which will proba...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 686, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...on in non-virtual communication skills. Also attending real life events starts to be...
^^^^
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
... no control on spending time there will effect our real life and even pshycology negat...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, well, for example, in short, speaking of, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1906.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06914893617 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84260489944 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547872340426 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7859981199 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.125 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226169212855 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074434803809 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784178751105 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122927701091 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109793012623 0.056905535591 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.