Many different countries have most shops and products as the same. Some consider it a positive dvelopment, whereas others consider it negative. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
In today’s modern world, globalization has its impact on almost every aspect of our lives. Many similar brands, shops and products are spread all over the world. Some people are of the opinion that this tevelopment has its advantages, while other people hold the view that it has generally a negative impact. I, however, side with the former view.
It is irrefutable that the consumers generally look for a product with a predictable quality. In this sence would the brand that is sold worldwide be more preferable compared with a local product? I believe that it would definitely win. For example, if the choice would be between the Armenian “Garoon” and internationally recognized “Adidas”, the consumers would choose the latter.
Another advantage of having trademarks and shops that have a huge chain in many countries, is that their products become more reachable to the local population. If fiew decades ago a regular Armenian consumer had to travel to Italy in order to buy Versaci shoes, today we have even two shops of this famous brand in Yerevan.
On the other side, the opponents of this view argue that the spread of well-known brands has its ecenomic pressure on the local production. The main reason for that is their cost effectiveness. Although they have similar or even higher prices than the local brands, their quality is mostly higher, as these products are designed also for the developed world. Nevertheless, I am confident that their presence will positively affect the quality of the local products to stay viable in the market.
To sum up, it can be reiterated that having branches of the same shops with same products has more advantages than disadvantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, well, while, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14234875445 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94950174479 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562277580071 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6564167344 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165787540515 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546384519948 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462736805428 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976922577468 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402342985697 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.