In recent decades, the work culture has changed drastically forcing employees to work for extended hours under extreme pressure. Although there are various methodologies undertaken to achieve customer satisfaction, very less attention is given to employees well-being. This essay will outline the causes of this issue as well as provide some viable solutions to it.
First of all, effective time management is the primary aspect in order to achieve your day to day tasks within expected hours. With this quality, an individual can produce great results along with the peace of his/ her mind. However, many employees lack this quality and are usually distracted doing unwanted activities such as checking their social media account and watching youtube videos on their mobile phones. Another contributing factor is the unrealistic work expectations set from an individual by their supervisors. In order to gain profits from clients, employees are allocated in projects where they are expected to do tasks that are beyond their knowledge and irrelevant to their experience. This is definitely an opportunity for an employee to gain more knowledge but demands additional hours and increases pressure on individual. In such cases, maximum of the time is spent on analysis of the task and to gain relevant knowledge rather than working on task immediately.
Companies can play a vital role in supporting employees to overcome these issues by providing trainings about time management and new technologies. Through this knowledge an individual will be benefitted professionally as they will be able to utilize their time well, be more focused on their tasks and ingnore unwanted distractions. Moreover, providing relevant technical knowledge before taking up new assignments will make sure that they are more focused and work smartly.
In conclusion, lack of focus and knowledge in employees can lead to unbalanced worklife. However, companies can step up and ensure that their employees get required knowledge and lead a healthy life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46202531646 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8929710966 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575949367089 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7633259291 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.066666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21809263543 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744872365521 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492614366648 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128609930838 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395013158054 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.