Many people support use of animals for testing medicines for humans. Others believe it isn’t appropriate to use animals for such experiments.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Utilization of animal-based experiments to investigate the suitability of medicines for humans has long been a matter of contention. While a myriad number of people subscribe to this attitude, some are on the opposite side, refuting the necessity of these tests.
Animal-based experiments, admittedly, have played a pivotal role in flourishing medicine production science, introducing a wide assortment of approaches functional for human treatment. Some specific animals, in this way, due to bearing a close resemblance to humans, have been tested to better comprehending of their reactions to particular illnesses. Mice, as a salient instance, have significant similarities in cell structure, reproduction and pain sensibility with humans. For this reason, not only have they assisted in prediction of human’s body response to certain medicines for treating pernicious diseases like blood cancer, for example, but also their contribution to give out remarkably quick-witted approaches for curing other animals, cannot be neglected. No wonder, then, such experiments have maintained their credibility for decades.
Despite the justifications about the functions of animal-based experiments aforementioned, some are of the view that these kinds of tests, when considering some of which culminating in death, are bereft of mercifulness in their nature. If it had not been for exploiting animals in unleashed rate of explorations, as they opine, a wide variety of animals would not been slaughtered in laboratories. Had they not been conducted for humans’ sake, however, enrichment in pharmaceutical science as apparent as it is observed now, would not be achieved.
To recapitulate, well-conducted animal-based testing for the betterment of conspicuous effects of medicines on humans, are truly compatible with my opinion, albeit extravagant rates without a benevolent attitude should be mindfully curbed.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.89247311828 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47117026497 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634408602151 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.2914080992 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.454545455 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300928150386 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109665288526 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661422278114 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17535865481 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428138471882 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 50.2224549098 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.82 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.