In this highly competitive world, people have been spending a significant amount of time while traveling as well as working at their workplaces. Indeed, this trend is not necessarily a positive development because it can lead to health problems as well as disruption of families and personal relationships. In this essay, I will discuss the demerits of this trend and the work-life balance of individuals.
To commence with, in this globalized world, workers have devoted themselves to work more than their working hours in their companies due to international competition in the market. This outcome harms the people's work by making it harder and tougher. Additionally, their productivity has not been improved by working for long hours in companies. Apart from this, people have to spend time in computing to their workplaces because of the traffic congestion on the roads during business hours. Consequently, after reaching home, they only have little energy left inside their bodies.
The work-life balance definition sets out the ideal balance between a person's working life and private life. However, these days individuals are unable to fulfill this balance because of spending extra hours working and traveling to their companies which has myriad reasons. Firstly, due to technological advancements and competitive competition among multinational firms, employees have been dedicated to their roles and responsibilities at their jobs. Secondly, the basic expense of a family is rapidly increasing day-by-day, such as the money spent on groceries and petroleum. Thus, it is tough for any person to run a family with regular monthly wages by working normal hours in the organization. Finally, it has been a major drawback in the social life of workers. For instance, a communication gap among family members since they do not have enough time to interact with each other due to the ongoing trend of working in the companies.
In conclusion, increasing of employment hours have badly affected the social and family life of people. Therefore, the management of companies should take some leads to come up with a solution in solving this problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... for long hours in companies Apart from this people have to spend time in computing ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
...tion sets out the ideal balance between a persons working life and private life However t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 924, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ngoing trend of working in the companies In conclusion increasing of employment h...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1780.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21994134897 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84913321003 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527859237537 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 341.0 20.2975951904 1680% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1780.0 106.682146367 1669% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 341.0 20.7667163134 1642% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 164.0 7.06120827912 2323% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360402070836 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.360402070836 0.084324248473 427% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216806322697 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743902099647 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 173.7 13.0946893788 1326% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -283.1 50.2224549098 -564% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 137.5 11.3001002004 1217% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.48 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 24.62 8.58950901804 287% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 60.0 9.78957915832 613% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 138.4 10.1190380762 1368% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 138.0 10.7795591182 1280% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.