Many people today prefer socializing online to that in the local community, do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
The critical development of the Internet and social media platforms are crucial, yet arguments about this alternation seem to not be ceased. In fact, many believe that this growth is unfavourable, of which I second.
On the one hand, socializing online provides convenience and reduces cost and time. Connecting through the Internet is accessible and simple to all individuals irrespective of their social status and finance. Moreover, social media eliminates geographical boundaries. As a result, people prefer this method because they cannot afford the time and effort to perform traditional communication. For instance, a student who is studying abroad cannot travel back and forth on a daily basis to reconnect with his family. With the help of the Internet, this person can see and talk to their relatives on a regular basis.
However, this method creates distance and unqualified communication skills. Even though as mentioned, the Internet minimizes geographical barrier, it generates mental barriers. In a gathering, people are rather getting distracted by their phones than orally interacting, which eventually leads to a destructive relationship. As this goes on, individuals isolated themselves and became different person compares to the one on social medias, numb and emotionless. Moreover, children and teenagers nowadays, with the overuse of online socialization, are not able to communicate properly. It is witnessed that many are failing interviews and job opportunities because they cannot talk and express themselves face to face, which leads to a society of unskilled and incompetent workers.
In conclusion, the Internet plays a substantial role in life and this advancement is indispensable. However, the excessive growth of this platform is producing a generation of unqualified and dependable individuals, which will be disadvantageous for the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill be disadvantageous for the society.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, second, so, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7153024911 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24925258797 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604982206406 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3672718586 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.375 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105772737446 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033984958539 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0287645662361 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0608012342415 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250170990655 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.6 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.