Many people today would argue that cinemas are becoming irrelevant due to new streaming services.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Are cinemas losing their popularity amongst people owing to the appearance of new streaming tools? Are they going to be replaced with these services in the near future? These are the questions that many have been bombarded with in recent years. Although it is opined by some that most people, no longer, do not go to cinemas due to the advent of new services such as Netflix, Opera, HBO and so forth, it will be proven by this essay that it heavily depends on individuals’ personal circumstances. In other words, some are avidly interested to watch a movie in a cinema since it is a source of entertainment and others prefer to see that film by streaming on the mentioned applications because of the family gatherings. Throughout the following paragraphs, these points of paramount importance will be meticulously scrutinized.
Some, for one, have a strong tendency to go to cinemas inasmuch as they can entertain themselves in their spare time, recharging their batteries and feeling refreshed. Take a 19-year-old teenager watching a movie called Dexter in Avatar Cinema in Toronto, with a bunch of his intimate friends, as an illustration. Since he finds this recreational activity engrossingly amazing, without any doubt, he will not stop going there whereas he can stay at home and watch it by using Netflix. It is, thus, exemplified by this glaringly apparent instance that some tend to go to a cinema to have fun as a pastime; as a result, it will remain popular among them no matter how many enticing streaming services are going to be introduced in the future.
Although some give preference to cinemas, others have the propensity to utilize newly released streaming services at their home since this is a practical approach to having adequate quality time with their families. In Toronto, since many are terribly engaged with their job and have a hectic lifestyle, they are into watching movies on HBO with their families at nights, to illustrate. By doing this, not only can they spend enough time with their beloved ones, but they can strengthen their bonds. By shedding light on this example, it is, therefore, crystal clear that people based on their circumstances pick cinema or streaming services.
To recapitulate, after careful situational analysis, some are a big fan of cinema due to its amusing nature. However, others widely capitalize on new streaming tools to watch their favourite movies with their families because they are considerably busy with their careers and this is a viable method to form a close relationship with them; hence, this does not mean that cinemas are going to be obsolete.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, whereas, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 24.0651302605 220% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 41.998997996 174% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2197.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 437.0 315.596192385 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02745995423 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80811319943 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530892448513 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 702.0 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.3794725423 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.3125 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3125 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135162940122 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554246794016 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438326344324 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962575831673 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401838919123 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.