Nowadays most green energy is becoming ever more prevalent in both developed and developing countries. Some argue they greatly reduce costs and are better for the environment, others believe they are a serious threat to energy security. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Due to the different problems arising from fossil fuels, nowadays, green energy has become widely used in different nations. Opinions diverge widely on whether this recent replacement has beneficial effects on people’s lives or not. Although it is opined that clean energy can be risky when it comes to energy sustainability, it will be proven by this essay that it is not only cheap, but environmentally friendly. Throughout the following paragraphs, these points of paramount importance will be meticulously scrutinized to rationally advocate the latter logical standpoint.
It is postulated that since alternative sources of energy may not be sustainable, this new method will jeopardize energy security, on the one hand. Take, using turbines to produce electricity in Manjil, Iran, 5 years ago, as an illustration. Due to the dried-up rivers in that area because of global warming, the turbines do not work anymore, leaving hundreds of villagers in that area without power for several months. It is, therefore, reasonable that bio-friendly forms of energy can be unsustainable after a while owing to the unpredictable climate. However, this perspective is somehow refuted by this essay.
I believe that new methods of producing energy incurred people fewer costs and more importantly, they are a pragmatic approach to environmental protection, on the other hand. Electric cars using solar panels are being utilized in developed countries such as Canada, Japan, the USA, …, to illustrate. By doing this, carbon emissions, arising from cars burning oil, have been reduced dramatically in those regions. Hence, not only can people save their money by using sunlight as a free source of energy, but serious environmental issues can be greatly addressed. By shedding light on this example, it is, thus, crystal clear that the more people reap the benefits of clean energy, the less they shoulder costs, and the more they can protect the nature.
To recapitulate, whereas the argument in favour of traditional types of energy might be convincing to some extent, I think that renewable ones bring more benefits, both economically and environmentally. It is, hence, hoped, these preponderant points will be taken into account by the masses throughout the world in the foreseeable future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, i think, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1939.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38611111111 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00443987302 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619444444444 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.040887459 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.1875 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185218044215 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528035693454 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496906678619 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101806175029 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422225687871 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.