Nowadays most green energy is becoming ever more prevalent in both developed and developing countries. Some argue they greatly reduce costs and are better for the environment, others believe they are a serious threat to energy security.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Energy is the major driving force of the world. Nations are looking at alternative sources to fulfill the power needs , which is although cost effective and eco friendly it is argued that it also makes countries energy insecure, I disagree to it. This essay will discuss benefits of moving away from un-natural sources and also potential problems related to it with relevant examples to support my points.
On the one hand, there is ample evidence that green energy leads is cheaper and causes less damage to environment is a gaining popularity rapidly. The central reason for this, they are naturally available to us and easily replenished. In addition to this, it is available at cheaper price due to easy availability. For example, Hydro and solar energy are boundless as they are drawn from nature and is inexpensive as compared to electricity generated from coal and gas. Therefore it is conclusively clear that owing to its non-pollutant nature and low cost it is looked as an efficient substitute by advanced as well as emerging economies.
On the other hand, although there is a case for sustainable energy being an alternate, the argument of it being threat to energy security cannot be understated. In order to cater to the necessities of citizens, military of a country countries refuse to share their resources to other who could not produce sufficient amounts of it. This leads to sudden changes of supply-demand balance. To illustrate this, China imports high amount of thermal power from their neighboring countries due to new environment laws of having a cap on production of non-renewable energy which oversaw a halt from them citing insufficiency for their own requirements. Thus it is possible to state that migrating to natural resources might pose a threat to several nations certainty of supply.
To conclude, despite being a menace to surety of energy to many nations, in my opinion the long term benefits to the habitat and short term advantages to people eclipses the disadvantages associated in using clean and green power.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ative sources to fulfill the power needs , which is although cost effective and ec...
^^
Line 1, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...relevant examples to support my points. On the one hand, there is ample evidence...
^^^
Line 2, column 472, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...lectricity generated from coal and gas. Therefore it is conclusively clear that owing to ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 645, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...sufficiency for their own requirements. Thus it is possible to state that migrating ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 741, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...esources might pose a threat to several nations certainty of supply. To conclude, desp...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in addition, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08284023669 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89669808714 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579881656805 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9406594313 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.714285714 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199643709718 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619484015263 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435158977645 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10676529909 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387284709225 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.