Many people work from home using modern technology today. Some people think that only the workers benefit from this and not employers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Undoubtedly, innovation has made our lifes easier. Now it is not mandatory to join office daily to do work due to flexibility of working from home. However, some individuals argue that it is more beneficial for employees than the employers. i somehow agree with the given statement, let us discuss it in detail.
First and foremost, it saves travel time and expenses of workers. To go deeper, someone who takes an hour to commute from home to office, he can surely utilize that span of time in performing their routine tasks at office. Whereas, employers do not need to pay extra for overtime and employee will definately agree because he knows, he is at home and no need to worry about rushing home early. A report by daily post UK shows shifts of people working from home is an average 9:30 hours whereas in offices is 8 hours. Also, they are more efficent on the tasks assigned to them and their performance is even better than regualar workers at office.
Additionally, the shifts are not the problem for the both employees and employers. To elaborate, these days lot of work is outsourced to different countries so people has to work in rotaional shifts such as night shifts. Even though, the people working back from there houses never deny to work in any shift. Whereas, in offices people on prefer to work in normal business hours. This makes work easy for everyone. Hence, the employer do not need to worry about the routine shifts and can save the nigh allowance as well which is given to attract the workers to work at nights.
To conclude, working from home is certainly helpful for everyone. People can relax at their home while managing the other household works and employers get an accurate work don by and employees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: I
...icial for employees than the employers. i somehow agree with the given statement,...
^
Line 9, column 104, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...yees and employers. To elaborate, these days lot of work is outsourced to different ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 310, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...houses never deny to work in any shift. whereas, in offices people on prefer to work in...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 310, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...houses never deny to work in any shift. whereas, in offices people on prefer to work in...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 416, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...urs. This makes work easy for everyone. Hence the employer do not need to worry about...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, so, well, whereas, while, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76973684211 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47017353064 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565789473684 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7396370684 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2941176471 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8823529412 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.29411764706 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264981934607 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875359340363 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592861301093 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173003862556 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254910466782 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.