In many places, new homes are needed, but the only place available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there.
What is your opinion about this?
In different parts of the world,with the growing population, there has been a surge in demand of houses. And for that, the only area left is by the countryside. Some say to preserve that location, we should not build new homes there. In my opinion, though humans are known for damaging the environment and countryside maybe next in line, a meaningful step like awareness for population control should be taken to take care of this problem for the reason that this is the only place available to set up new homes and there is no where to go.
Humans have always taken things for granted. And it is because of this reason, that they are short of needful amenities. People who do not favour the possibility of new construction by countryside are well aware of the adverse effects that human beings cause. From their point of view, these outsiders have already ruined their cities and in order to preserve this peaceful area, these local people do not agree with the solution of coming up with new infrastructure in their area. Moreover, they are of the perception that the city people will cause damage to this peaceful habitat by causing air, as well as water pollution. To exemplify, younger generation in India are choosing to open their cafes in Manali, which is a hill station. This has led to increase in people visiting those places and contributing to increase in litter, ultimately causing negative impact on the surroundings.
One possible solution for taking control is to make people aware about the current situation. They should be taught about the problems caused by increase in population so that they do proper family planning. This in turn, would help them to save the available amenities for their future generation. To illustrate, Chinese people in 1950 took a measure to control their population by introducing one child policy. It took them more than 70 years to come up with a positive result. Government and educational institutions must take the responsibility to spread awareness about this, as it would take an entire generation to eradicate this problem. It would eventually make these people realise that they are blessed with limited facilities and therefore, they must take proper care of that, without and misuse.
To conclude, people who argue about not allowing to build new things in countryside are well aware with the consequences. But, we need to realise that there is no other option. Having said, we must also realise that without the facilities provided to us by mother earth, we would not be able to survive. Hence, population control should be done to save our future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , with
In different parts of the world,with the growing population, there has been ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 526, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ilable to set up new homes and there is no where to go. Humans have always ta...
^^
Line 13, column 50, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'building'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: building
...de, people who argue about not allowing to build new things in countryside are well awar...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 49.0 24.0651302605 204% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 41.998997996 171% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2185.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 442.0 315.596192385 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94343891403 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65310058075 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506787330317 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 698.4 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4250691457 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3181818182 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77272727273 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250674990596 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698889382226 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777914785237 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159764236602 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0975443739695 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.