In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe that it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there.
What is your opinion about this?
Wouldn’t it be detrimental for an ecosystem to build a society in the countryside area by cutting trees down? Due to a constant increase in population, shelter is the most contentious issue nowadays. Although the countryside can be a new home for people to live, it is not advisable. This essay discusses the possible solution for the space issue inside the city and the importance of the surrounding area of the city to maintain the environment and not to waste it.
While space to live is a major concern nowadays in the city for people to live, high rise buildings are the solution. This does not require a large land space. For example, due to the heavy population, China has built towers of more than a hundred floors which may provide shelter to people. Moreover, these tower blocks are more sustainable and less vulnerable to the earthquake as compared to the normal building as per the scientific research.
The Countryside is the only area surrounding the city with ample amount of trees and farms which is essential for the ecosystem. Large cities with a heavy population such as Mumbai and Delhi don’t have any kind of ruler areas covered with trees. As a result, the amount of pollution is too high as per the government declaration as compared to the green city such as Bangalore. In addition, building new homes would certainly need to clear trees out which may create the imbalance in the environment and give rise to global warming. This might increase the average temperature and create other issues such as no land to farm and less amount of rain. Therefore it is advisable that the countryside should remain natural.
In conclusion, I think that the reconstruction of tall buildings can solve the problem of scarcity of land. However, the countryside is not the ideal alternative to provide shelter as it may give rise to certain serious and unsolvable environmental problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 656, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...o land to farm and less amount of rain. Therefore it is advisable that the countryside sh...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93498452012 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84545557537 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517027863777 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1841863111 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.625 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213501102035 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068762063685 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607029261767 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127142219075 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538698640866 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.